Recent Updates

 

08/26/2025 12:00 AM

Classic V8 Defender gets Series 1 makeover for £250k

 

08/25/2025 12:00 PM

Mercedes-AMG GT XX smashes electric car distance record

 

08/25/2025 12:00 PM

3000 miles in Cupra's 328bhp super wagon

 

08/25/2025 12:00 PM

Audi Q3 Sportback returns for second generation from £39,800

 

08/24/2025 12:00 PM

How London's iconic black cabs will survive the Uber age

 

08/24/2025 12:00 PM

Cars can share platforms but be completely different

 

08/23/2025 12:00 PM

Alien concept: Driving a Hyundai pick-up to Area 51

 

08/23/2025 12:00 PM

The student racing series shaping motorsport's future

 

08/23/2025 12:00 AM

HMRC raises amount that company EV drivers can claim back

 

08/22/2025 12:00 PM

Audi priming run-out special for five-cylinder RS3

<<    38   39   40   41   42   >>

EV, Hybrid, Hydrogen, Solar & more 21st century mobility!

< Prev    of 7185   Next >
Mazda CX-30
Wednesday, Mar 05, 2025 12:00 AM
mazda cx30 rt 2025 front corner jh 31 'No replacement for displacement' is the thinking behind this compact crossover hatchback Volume car makers no longer seem to believe that bigger-capacity combustion engines have any place in smaller cars. Save, perhaps, for one.Always an advocate of a sophisticated, multi-solution approach to decarbonisation, Mazda has been quietly running in the opposite direction to many of its peers when it comes to powertrain strategy. In 2022, it introduced a medium-sized SUV, the Mazda CX-60, with a brand-new, six-cylinder turbo diesel engine. And the same year, when rivals were announcing three-cylinder turbo alternatives, it added a 2.5-litre four-cylinder atmospheric petrol option to its big-selling Mazda CX-5.Now, as part of a continued initiative of ‘engine right-sizing’, it has replaced a 2.0-litre unit with that same 2.5 in the nose of both the Mazda 3 hatchback and the closely related Mazda CX-30 crossover.It’s the latter we’re looking at here, a car that has also just had some minor equipment upgrades for 2025. Can it possibly make sense to continue to ignore forced induction, then, and go large on cubic capacity in a car like this?
< Prev    of 7185   Next >
Leave a Comment
* Name
* Email (will not be published)
*
Click on me to change image  * Enter verification code (Click on the CAPTCHA to refresh the image!)
* - Reqiured fields